Hermes Agent · local models

Which local model for Hermes Agent: scores on quoting, not chat

Short answer: Notes mattered more than model size: Qwen3 8B scored 1/40 alone and 33/40 with company notes (on Fieldstone IT, Dell test box, 30 Sep), then 40/40 with notes plus the quote action (16 GB Mac mini, 6 Oct).

Most advice on Hermes Agent models asks whether a model loads and holds a conversation. A business needs something else: does it get the job right, against answers you already know? We graded three local models on one task, drafting a quote from a price list, and the size of the model turned out to matter less than what it was given to read. Tell us which model you are weighing in the form below; a person on our team replies.

Updated 14 October 2026 · built on Hermes Agent, not affiliated with Nous Research

Staffbox is built on Hermes Agent (Nous Research, MIT license). Staffbox is not affiliated with Nous Research.

Notes took the 8B from 1/40 to 33/40 on Fieldstone IT (Dell test box, 30 Sep) and the quote action to 40/40; model size barely moved it

Without the brain (the folder of company notes Hermes reads), the 8B model scored 1 out of 40 on the fictional IT provider Fieldstone IT, and the 27B model scored 2. Neither knew the firm's prices, products or rules, and a model three times larger could not guess them either. With the brain alone, the 8B reached 33 and the 27B 39 on Fieldstone (Dell test box, 30 Sep). Adding a quote action that looks prices up and does the arithmetic in code took both to 40 out of 40.

Fieldstone IT score out of 40, by model and setup Qwen3 8B, no notes (Dell) 1 Qwen3 8B, notes only (Dell) 33 Qwen3 8B, notes + quote action (Mac mini) 40 Qwen3 27B, no notes (Dell) 2 Qwen3 27B, notes only (Dell) 39 Qwen3 27B, notes + quote action (Dell) 40 gpt-oss-20b, notes + quote action (Dell) 39 Outline = no notes · track = 40 tests
Fieldstone IT score out of 40 for each model and setup; bars from zero, outlined bars are the no-notes baseline. Dell = RTX 3090 test machine (30 Sep 2026; gpt-oss-20b 2 Oct 2026); Mac mini = 16 GB M4 (6 Oct 2026). Models: Qwen3 8B, Qwen3 27B, gpt-oss-20b. Fictional company, machine-graded. Source: results files on GitHub.

A cloud model showed the same pattern with notes only (it had no quote action). On the clean set a leading cloud model (Gemini Pro) scored 5/40 without the notes and 39/40 with them. On 20 messy held-out requests the comparison was local with the quote action against cloud with notes only: the local 27B priced all 17 priceable requests, got 14 exactly right and declined 2 of the 3 it should not price; the cloud model got 14 of 20 and refused six it could have priced. fact One comparison, small sample, from our own offer notes.

With notes, the 8B model on a 16 GB Mac mini matched the 27B on both clean sets

The design, not the parameter count, carried the result on this task. That does not make the 8B as good as the 27B on every task; we tested one. Companies are fictional: Fieldstone IT is an IT provider, Peachtree Cabinet Works is a cabinet shop.

1/40Qwen3 8B on Fieldstone IT without the brainDell RTX 3090 · 30 Sep 2026
40/40Qwen3 8B on Fieldstone IT with notes plus the quote action (33/40 notes alone, Dell, 30 Sep)16 GB Mac mini M4 · 6 Oct 2026
39/40gpt-oss-20b on Fieldstone IT; needs 32 GB, Apple speed not measuredDell RTX 3090 · 2 Oct 2026
ModelMachineSetupResultDate
Qwen3 8BDell, RTX 3090No brainFieldstone IT 1/4030 Sep 2026
Qwen3 27BDell, RTX 3090No brainFieldstone IT 2/4030 Sep 2026
Qwen3 8BDell, RTX 3090Brain onlyFieldstone IT 33/4030 Sep 2026
Qwen3 27BDell, RTX 3090Brain onlyFieldstone IT 39/4030 Sep 2026
Qwen3 27BDell, RTX 3090Brain + quote actionFieldstone 40/40, Peachtree 39/4030 Sep 2026
Qwen3 8B16 GB Mac mini M4Brain + quote actionUnseen messy set 15/15; Fieldstone 40/40, Peachtree 39/40; generated regression set (model-written requests, code-checked answers) 351/3606 Oct 2026
gpt-oss-20bDell, RTX 3090Brain + quote actionFieldstone 39/40, Peachtree 40/40, messy 15/152 Oct 2026

Sources are listed below. The 27B model class is what a Mac Studio would run, and Studio speed is not measured. The Mac mini figures are on the Mac mini page, including timings per test set.

gpt-oss-20b is the non-Qwen option: one test short on Fieldstone, but it needs 32 GB

Some buyers cannot run Alibaba models. For them, gpt-oss-20b scored 39/40 on Fieldstone IT, 40/40 on Peachtree Cabinet Works and 15/15 on a messy held-out set, all on the Dell test machine. Two costs come with it: it needs 32 GB of memory, twice the demo Mac mini, and its speed on Apple hardware is not measured. The results files date those runs 2 October 2026. Rules on which models some public buyers may use are on the non-Chinese model page and the government page. On a new trade it had never seen, an electrical distributor (14 Oct, Dell test box), the default Qwen3 8B setup scored 30 of 40 and 2 of 15 on messy requests, with 8 wrong prices in 55, because per-foot units, price levels and trade shorthand are not handled yet; that is why we score your own list first (the electrical result).

Models we have not graded, including the one the Hermes docs favour, need your own 30-request test

The Hermes local Ollama guide (checked 13 October 2026) lists gemma4:31b as the one model on its table with reliable tool calling, and says it needs 24 GB or more of RAM. We have not run gemma4 on a quoting task, so we neither recommend nor rule it out. A third-party write-up reports that qwen3, with a 40K native window, trips Hermes's context check while gpt-oss at 128K passes (betterclaw.io, as reported, seen 13 October 2026). Our installer gets Qwen3 8B past that check by setting the window to 65,536; the details, and the prompt lengths we have not tested, are on the 64K page.

To choose for your own job, grade it the way we did:

  1. Write 30 real requests and the right answers. Hold 10 back.
  2. Run the smallest model that fits your hardware, with your notes.
  3. If it misses, fix in this order: the notes, then the tool, then the model.
  4. Count a refusal as a miss. A model that declines everything scores well on "no wrong prices" and badly on usefulness.
  5. Grade the held-out 10 blind. Fifteen requests is a small sample; thirty is better.

Related: Hermes Agent on a Mac mini (what a 16 GB M4 did on a quoting task) · Hermes Agent with Ollama (the settings the demo unit uses) · Hermes Agent and 64K context (the 65,536 setting every score was measured at).

Back to the Hermes Agent hub. Full model list: models. Scorecard logic: AI quote accuracy scorecard.

Questions

Is qwen3 good enough for Hermes Agent?

On our quoting task, Qwen3 8B with the brain and quote action scored 40/40 on Fieldstone IT and 39/40 on Peachtree Cabinet Works, both fictional. Without the brain it scored 1/40. We have not tested other tasks.

Does gpt-oss work with Hermes Agent?

gpt-oss-20b scored 39/40 on Fieldstone IT, 40/40 on Peachtree Cabinet Works and 15/15 on a messy set on our Dell test machine. It needs 32 GB. Apple speed is not measured.

Is a bigger local model always better?

Not on our task. The 8B model with the brain and the quote action matched the 27B on the clean sets. Without the brain both failed.

Sources

Or call us: 404 493 6248

Ask usTextCall